What I do Before (fixed width, tables, invalid html, 8-div rounded-border hacks): After (liquid, clean, valid xhtml/css): Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
I don’t know code, but I’ll trust you if you say its clean. All non-propietary browsers? All OS’s? Nice. Certainly looks better, cleaner lines. Reply
The spec is to IE6 (Win) and FF1.5 (Win/OSX/Unix), at a minimum res of 800×600. It renders properly IE7 and FF2, but technically they’re unsupported. Reply
clutter mess of govt jumble versus logical, orderly internet friendly site. It amazes me that people design websites that look like old 1970s style newsletters h Reply
It becomes much less amazing when you realize most govt designers have only studied print, and that was thirty years ago. :) Reply
It’s not live yet, so no. I just finished rewriting the feedback form, so it should be up soon. Reply
I don’t know code, but I’ll trust you if you say its clean. All non-propietary browsers? All OS’s? Nice.
Certainly looks better, cleaner lines.
The spec is to IE6 (Win) and FF1.5 (Win/OSX/Unix), at a minimum res of 800×600. It renders properly IE7 and FF2, but technically they’re unsupported.
clutter mess of govt jumble versus logical, orderly internet friendly site.
It amazes me that people design websites that look like old 1970s style newsletters
h
It becomes much less amazing when you realize most govt designers have only studied print, and that was thirty years ago. :)
ahh you have created art from the mundane. :)
Ahhh :) Looks like that was very satisfying to do.
there’s a request for feedback…have any users responded?
It’s not live yet, so no. I just finished rewriting the feedback form, so it should be up soon.